![]() ![]() If it was doing the kind of trickiness as above, someone would have likely noticed and blown the whistle.īut don't think Chrome Extensions are totally safe. It seems to me that AdBlock is not overly dangerous as the developer has identified himself and it is used by millions of people. That Being Said, Is AdBlock itself Dangerous? #Ad clocker plus passwordThis can be used to steal your password which is even worse than stealing your token. Which essentially will route any keys you press to a remote server. #Ad clocker plus codeHowever, AdBlock CAN run code equivalent to this. AdBlock cannot access JavaScript variables. If you are on a website with secure authentication, and there is a JavaScript object with something private like an AuthKey, you are safe. ![]() Adblock cannot access JavaScript variables. That means AdBlock (and any Chrome extension with that permission) can access your DOM. The way AdBlock works is that it injects script into your browser, which searches the DOM, and then runs a hide() function on what it determines are ads. Adblock can access the DOM (document object model) on all pages. Adblock prevents these.īelow is the original, cautionary answer: Yes, it totally is.Īdblock Plus is a browser extension/add-on developed by an independent developer. #Ad clocker plus installThe real risk are malicious ads that prompt you to install software on your computer. However, United Internet still maintains it's position that they do not want users who visit their sites to use ad blockers and said they will develop other anti-blocking methods in the future ( German source).Īfter thinking it over, I have to agree with the other answers in that, despite the fact that it CAN access your data, Adblock is more likely to protect your privacy than invade it. This list is by no means complete so it is not a reliable source when you want to know if your browser has crapware installed. #Ad clocker plus updateUpdate #2: GMX now says that they will no longer display the link when you use ad blockers but will still display it if you use crapware that injects adverts, the list at the site has been updated accordingly and now lists only a small collection of crapware. The Wall Street Journal (German edition) named the warnings displayed on GMX and the site they link to a "scare campaign". Update #1: United Internet, the company behind GMX, received a lot of criticism for misleading customers by falsely claiming that there is a security risk on their PC. Unfortunately, I have no English source at hand (because it's a German only campaign) but since you speak German you may want to read this article at. Of course such campaigns are very unusual, especially from such a big and well known company like GMX. They added some crapware to the list to make it look more legitimate. There is absolutely no security risk from the mentioned ad blockers. This is a FUD ( fear, uncertainty, and doubt) campaign by GMX because they want to display their ads. Ok, they mention other (pretty obviously crapware) addons, but is Adblock Plus really a security threat or do that site's operators simply use the opportunity to try and scare inexperienced users into viewing their ads again? Security mechanisms such as SSL cannot avoid that. Such addons can access all your browser's input and can also forward them to third parties - even your banking password. Sicherheitsmechanismen wie SSL können das nicht verhindern. Dies kann auf allen Web-Seiten passieren. Solche Add-ons haben Zugriff auf alle Ihre Eingaben im Browser und können diese auch an Dritte weitergeben – auch Ihr Bank-Passwort. Here's a quote from that site plus its translation: My email-provider's website ( ) recently started linking to the (German) site which basically claims that due to its capabilities to modify a site's appearance, Adblock Plus (and others) might actually be abused for phising. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() You can disable them from within System Preferences, Extensions, Photos Projects, but they’ll just be disabled, not uninstalled. It’s important to remember that they do exist as applications inside your Applications folder, because removing them from that directory is how you uninstall them. You access the applications by going back into Photos and into the Create menu where you’ll see your newly installed extensions. #Shutterfly mac photos extension not showing up install#The other services are for wall art, web galleries, and collages.Īfter you install one or more of these apps from the App Store, you’ll see them in your Applications folder but they don’t actually DO anything in the standalone environment. When you go to the App Store you’ll see 5 other extensions you can add beyond Motif and Mimeo Photos, so not a whole lot in here yet but it’s a new service. If you choose an option, such as calendar in my example, you’ll see an icon for App Store. ![]() To initiate a project in Apple Photos, you go to File, pull down to Create and there you’ll see choices for Book, Calendar, Card, Wall Decor, Prints, Slideshow and Other. You may never make a calendar yourself, but if my experience is anything like how it works for books or cards or other services, you might just want to give Mimeo Photos a try. I tested both of them and found that Mimeo Photos was more to my liking but it’s worth taking a look at Motif as well. Motif is another good option for creating calendars and other projects. I should mention that Mimeo Photos isn’t the only option available. The old Apple interface was so aggravating, I was looking forward with optimism to the new Mimeo Photos interface. In theory with Mimeo Photos we’ll get the same quality of products but with a new interface. Turns out Mimeo Photos is the company that Apple used for all of its print services in the past. ![]() I’m going to focus this article on the extension called Mimeo Photos from. Apple has a support article that describes how these new extensions are supposed to work from within Apple Photos. They created a plugin architecture for Apple Photos so that third-party companies could fill the gap. Apple Ends Photos Projectsįast forward to this year in September when Apple announced that they were dropping their own tools for making projects like calendars, books, cards and more. ![]() I was severely disappointed on that front if anything they went from mediocre to horribly frustrating.īart also makes calendars with Apple Photos, so he and I used to get together every year to bemoan how awful the process was. When Apple introduced Photos as the replacement for iPhoto, I was optimistic that the layout features would be vastly improved. The Project section of iPhoto where I originally created my calendars had layout tools that I would put just above mediocre. I switched back to Apple and never tested any other services. While I adore Shutterfly for my annual photo Christmas card, their calendar was definitely not up to the caliber of Apple’s printing services. Nearly every year I’ve used Apple’s services to print my calendars, wavering only once by trying out Shutterfly. I can tell they really like it because once or twice I’ve tried to opt people out to save money only to get huge protests and be forced to add them back in. These monthly collages make us all very happy. Every year for the last 25 or 30 years, I’ve created a photo calendar for my family. ![]() |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |